Roller Bearing Co. of America v. Bearing, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHN MORGAN DAVIS, District J udge.
Before the Court is the defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Document 127), pursuant to Federal Civil Rule 56, wherein it seeks dismissal of this action as to United States Patent No. 2,884,288 (’288), on the grounds of invalidity.1
*705Specifically, the defendant asserts that the ’288 patent is invalid, alleging that several commercial applications were placed on sale or in some cases actually sold to the public on at least five separate occasions, each more than one year prior to the filing of an application for letters patent on August 31,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- John P. O'Brien v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- William R. Watts v. The University of Delaware, an Agency of the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Carborundum Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Stanley Works v. McKinney Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Watts v. University of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1979