Tate v. Gairdner
Supreme Court of Georgia
Citation and appeal. Before Judge Holden. Elbert superior court. January 5, 1903.
1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.
H. K. Gairdner and J. H. Grogan were the executors of the will of George W. Dye. Both having died, Tate was appointed administrator with the will annexed of Dye’s estate. Tate cited Mrs. Lavonia Gairdner, as administratrix of the estate of H. K. Gairdner, and the executors of Grogan before the ordinary for the settlement of the accounts of the executors of Dye. The only allegation in the petition upon which the citation was based, as to the liability of the executors, was in the following words: “ There still remains in the estates of said H. K. Gairdner and John H. Grogan assets belonging to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hendy v. MarchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- St. Louis Lager Beer Bottling Co. v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Shorter v. HargrovesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Gairdner v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Warner v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trust Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Phillips v. AblesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Stone v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Tucker v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- City of Lawrenceville v. Ricoh Electronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.