Legal Opinion

Seaton v. National Grange Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 12, 1987PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0PINI0N

FRANKS, Judge.

Plaintiff’s action to recover the value of his stolen automobile from his insurance company was dismissed by the trial judge on the basis that plaintiff’s misrepresentations, made at the time of obtaining the policy, “increased the risk of loss.”1

The jury empaneled to establish the facts, responding to interrogatories, answered the insured had made misrepresentations about his driving record but the misrepresentation was not made with the intent to deceive.

Plaintiff’s application for insurance, signed and dated December 1, 1984, under “Violations and Chargeable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Volunteer State Life Ins. v. RichardsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Broyles v. Ford Life Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Little v. Washington Nat. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  4. Sloop v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Tennessee Farmers Life Reassurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. Sine v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  3. State Farm General Insurance Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  4. Tennessee Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  5. Vermont Mutual Insurance Co. v. ChiuCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API