Legal Opinion

Idaho Apple Growers' Assn. v. Brown

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1930No. 5506PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

In the summer and fall of 1923, certain growers of fruit and vegetables, including defendant and respondent, Brown, living in the vicinity of Caldwell, in order to obtain the advantages of a co-operative marketing of that year’s fruit crop, determined to work in conjunction with one another in an effort to market each individual grower’s fruit, it being agreed by and between said growers, including respondent, “that no grower should have any interest in any other grower’s crop or the proceeds thereof, and that each grower should receive all the proceeds from the sale of his individual crops…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ray v. PowersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Davies v. SkinnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Boston Base Ball Ass'n v. Brooklyn Base Ball ClubNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Robbins Co. v. CookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Simpson v. RitchieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Venus Lodge No. 62 v. Acme Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Idaho Apple Growers Assn. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API