Gen. Dynafab, Inc. v. Chelsea Industries, Inc.

The appellant, Chelsea Industries, Inc. (Chelsea), questions the propriety of the trial court’s decision to grant a motion for a new trial limited to damages where the issue of damages is inextricably intertwined with that of liability and where the damages, lost future profits, are speculative. We are satisfied that the trial court acted correctly and accordingly affirm the decision of the trial court.

Chelsea and appellee, General Dynafab, Inc. (Dynafab), entered an agreement wherein Chelsea would manufacture and sell products produced by a process called “Fiberweld Process” which had been…