Legal Opinion

Drummy v. Stern

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 11, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Justice.

The judgment we are asked to review upholds the validity of six materialmen’s liens in varying amounts in favor of ap-pellees, I. H. Stern, Smith-Haggard Lumber Co., Inc., R. P. McDaniel, doing business as McDaniel Lumber Co., J. H. Middleton, Robert Weissinger, and W. ,T. Congleton Company.

Appellants, -Mary Drummy and Sarah Mullen, doing business as Drummy-Mullen Mortgage and Development Company, contracted with A. E. Jaggie, doing business as - Buildw;ell Construction Company, to construct two houses on lots 28 and 30, BÍock R, Unit 7 of the Meadows Subdivision to the City…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eline Realty Co. v. FoemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  2. Blackerby v. OderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Vogt v. Cannon Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Haynie v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roethke v. SangerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Calcourt Properties, Inc. v. Barnes Construction Co.Chesterfield County Circuit Court · 1990
  3. Roethke v. SangerKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API