Legal Opinion
Eline Realty Co. v. Foeman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided September 26, 1952PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Commissioner.
The Eline Realty Company instituted this declaratory judgment action against Roy H. Foeman seeking to have the court determine their respective rights under a written contract. Judgment was entered in favor of Foeman in the sum of $38,689.14. The Eline Realty Company has appealed and Foeman has cross-appealed.
On January 2, 1946, A. J. Eline and Pearl Ruth Hartman, partners doing business as Eline Realty Company, entered into-a written contract with Roy IT. Foeman,. the pertinent part reading as follows:
“Whereby party of the second part, Roy H. Foeman, agrees to give his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Middlesboro Home Telephone Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Columbia Gas & Electric Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Omegas Group, Inc., Debtor. Xl/datacomp, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. John R. Wilson, Trustee, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Suter v. MazyckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
- In Re Larbar Corporation, Debtor. Kentucky Central Insurance Company v. Robert J. Brown, Trustee United States of America, on Behalf of the Internal Revenue Service Liberty National Bank of Lexington Commonwealth of Kentucky United States TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Shattuck v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Carroll v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.