Legal Opinion

Yamaner v. Orkin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 30, 1988No. 178, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

Certiorari was granted in the instant matter to review an imposition of sanctions under Maryland Rule 1-341 based on the renewal of a motion for summary judgment in a medical malpractice case. The rule reads:

In any civil action, if the court finds that the conduct of any party in maintaining or defending any proceeding was in bad faith or without substantial justification the court may require the offending party or the attorney advising the conduct or both of them to pay the adverse party the costs of the proceeding and the reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorney’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Merchants Mortgage Co. v. LubowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Dent v. SimmonsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Legal Aid Bureau, Inc. v. FarmerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Century I Condominium Ass'n v. Plaza Condominium Joint VentureCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Blanton v. Equitable Bank, National Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. St. Luke Evangelical Lutheran Church, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Sadler v. Dimensions Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Newman v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Needle v. White, Mindel, Clarke and HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Bits "N" Bytes Computer Supplies, Inc. v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API