Legal Opinion

Stedman v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 22, 1933PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EbogdeN, I.(1) Is the gasoline tax a property tax or an excise tax? (2) If an excise tax, is the same invalid by virtue of the constitutional exemption in Article Y, section 5 thereof ?

A phase of this case was heretofore considered in O’Berry v. Mecklenburg County, 198 N. C., 357, 151 S. E., 880. The statute then in force did not expressly include a municipality or political subdivision of the State within the definition of distributor. Consequently, the Court held that a county was not a distributor and liable for the tax on motor fuel used by such county in the discharge of its governmental…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hart Refineries v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Foster & Creighton Co. v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  4. O'berry, State Treasurer v. . Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. People v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. ChekanowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Town of Benson v. County of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. State v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Powell v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API