Stedman v. City of Winston-Salem
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EbogdeN, I.(1) Is the gasoline tax a property tax or an excise tax? (2) If an excise tax, is the same invalid by virtue of the constitutional exemption in Article Y, section 5 thereof ?
A phase of this case was heretofore considered in O’Berry v. Mecklenburg County, 198 N. C., 357, 151 S. E., 880. The statute then in force did not expressly include a municipality or political subdivision of the State within the definition of distributor. Consequently, the Court held that a county was not a distributor and liable for the tax on motor fuel used by such county in the discharge of its governmental…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hart Refineries v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Foster & Creighton Co. v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- O'berry, State Treasurer v. . Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- People v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. ChekanowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Town of Benson v. County of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Powell v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.