Legal Opinion

State v. City of Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1933No. 3 Div. 57PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSTER, Justice.

The questions here presented are: (1) The sufficiency of count 3, and (2) of plea 3 as an answer to the common counts. The rulings were adverse to the state causing a non-suit to review them by appeal.

C-ount 3 claims an amount “due by defendant for gasoline taxes on gasoline used and withdrawn from storage as required by” certain acts of the Legislature there mentioned by their title. Plea 3 is that defendant purchased the gasoline outside of Alabama, shipped it in tank cars directly into storage tanks of defendant, and that defendant withdrew it from time to time from such…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Texas Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Hart Refineries v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Graves v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. National Linen Service Corp. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Pure Oil Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. City of Birmingham v. State Ex Rel. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API