Legal Opinion

Andreu v. Wellman

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 7, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

There are before us here two actions to recover for personal injuries growing out of the same alleged *37negligence. By stipulation they were tried together. At the close of the plaintiffs’ cases, the defendant rested and moved for a directed verdict in each. The cases are before us on exceptions to the granting of such motions. Exceptions to the exclusion of certain evidence were waived in argument.

The defendant was the owner of a 1936 Buick automobile. On August 26, 1944, he drove this car into the garage of the Lewiston Battery Service Company, the business of which was the selling and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Hatch v. Globe Laundry Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  3. Howe v. HoudeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  4. Haskell v. HerbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quinn v. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. Colvin v. BarrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  3. Lajoie v. BilodeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
  4. Carver v. LavigneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  5. Cox v. SinclairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API