Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Globe Laundry Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 12, 1934PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover for personal injuries caused, as he alleges, by the defendant’s negligence. The case was heard by the presiding Justice with a right reserved by both parties to except in matters of law. He found for the plaintiff, and the defendant filed exceptions, which are now before us.

The circumstances of the accident, as set forth by the pleadings and established by the evidence, are peculiar. There is no serious dispute as to what happened. On the twenty-third day of June, 1933, one Small, an employee of the defendant, parked a truck of the defendant on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  4. Eckert v. . the Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Maloney v. . KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. State v. WarnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. Ginn v. Penobscot CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. Hersum v. Kennebec Water DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  5. Orr v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API