Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Herbert

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 23, 1946PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

This is an action of negligence brought by the administrator of the deceased, one Ered A. Morin, under the provisions of Chap. 152, Sections 9 and 10 of the Revised Statutes of 1944 (known as Lord Campbell’s Act), to recover damages for death without conscious suffering of Mr. Morin. At the close of the testimony; counsel for the defendant moved for a directed verdict, which was granted. To this ruling the sole exception relates.

It is elemental that

“A verdict should not be ordered by the trial court when, giving the party having the burden of proof the most favorable view of his facts and of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spang v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  2. Scammon v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  3. Robichaud v. Napoleon St. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  4. Sanborn v. StoneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  5. Andreu v. WellmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API