Legal Opinion
Tyler v. RE/MAX Mountain States, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 21, 2000No. 99-1421PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to review the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b), after an adverse jury verdict. The jury found RE/MAX intentionally discriminated against Mr. Tyler on the basis of race by denying his franchise application, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and the Federal Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. 1
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Mr. Tyler is an African American real estate agent and broker. Since 1991, he has owned…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Robert F. Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell, Board of Education, Body Corporate Cromwell Board of Education Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Johnson v. Weld County, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PVNF, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Plotke v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Bryant v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.