Legal Opinion

Melby v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 1985No. C1-84-601PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

The Commissioner of Public Safety (Commissioner) revoked the driving privileges of the Respondent Melby under Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1984), the Implied Consent Statute, for operating a snowmobile at a time when he had a blood alcohol concentration in excess of .10. The Dakota County Court rescinded the revocation by holding the snowmobile, at the time of the arrest, was not operated on a street or highway. On appeal, the Commissioner contended that the Implied Consent Statute applies to mo tor vehicles operated anywhere in the state. Alternatively, he contended that respondent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Heddan v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Schafer v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ruzic v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. MattsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. Great American Insurance Co. v. GollaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API