Legal Opinion
State v. McQuillan
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided March 28, 2003No. 02-285, 02-278, 02-279, 02-289, 02-307, 02-349, 02-404, 02-471, 02-495, 03-009, 03-115 and 03-116PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Allen, C J. (Ret.),
¶ 1. Specially Assigned. In the above-consolidated appeals involving prosecutions for DUI (driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor), defendants challenge the district court’s refusal to suppress breath tests based on their contention that the administrative rules pertaining to the collection of breath samples are legally insufficient. We affirm.
¶ 2. Before addressing the principal issue common to each of the consolidated appeals, we consider the lead defendant’s argument that the district court did not have jurisdiction to suspend his driver’s license because a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. StrakaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GartheSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- State v. RolfeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- State v. MasseySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- State v. MagoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Kimberly LoveSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- State v. GrenierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In Re Sleigh Ex Rel. Unnamed MotoristsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- State v. BurnettSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.