Legal Opinion

Ott v. Raburn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1948No. 16275PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1. "Mere apprehension of irreparable injury from an alleged nuisance consisting of a house in course of construction for a lawful business use is not sufficient to authorize an injunction. If it be a nuisance, the consequences must be to a reasonable degree certain." Richmond Cotton Oil Co. v. Castellaw, 134 Ga. 472 (67 S.E. 1126); Thomoson v. Sammon, 174 Ga. 751, 757 (164 S.E. 45); Wingate v. Doerun, 177 Ga. 374 (170 S.E. 226).

2. Where, as here, the bill of exceptions recites that counsel for the plaintiffs in error stated in open court that the plaintiffs did not contend that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richmond Cotton Oil Co. v. CastellawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Thomoson v. SammonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Wingate v. City of DoerunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Wofford Oil Co. v. DavidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API