Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 30, 2019No. H043742PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElia, J.

*1011Steven M. Goldstein appeals following the denial of his petition for writ of administrative mandate to compel the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (the Board) to set aside its decision denying unemployment insurance benefits. We agree with Goldstein that the Board misapplied the governing law, thereby committing an abuse of discretion. However, because Goldstein fails to show that the error was prejudicial, we nevertheless affirm.

*722I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Goldstein worked as an IT analyst until March 6, 2013. He filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits (the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In Re JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Campos v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cajon Valley Union School District v. DragerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Lateef v. City of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API