State v. Lundy
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JOY COSSICH LOBRANO, Judge.
hThe defendant, Daron Lundy (“Defendant”), timely appeals his conviction of one count of armed robbery with a firearm, in violation of La. R.S. 14:64.3. In his sole assignment of error, Defendant asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress statement. After a thorough review of the record and the relevant jurisprudence, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights when giving his statement to police, as we discuss fully below. We therefore…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KinardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State of Louisiana v. Ray Donald Brister, Jr.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020