In Re Champion Technologies, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRY McCALL, Justice.
This mandamus proceeding concerns the enforcement of an arbitration agreement. Relators, Champion Technologies, Inc. (Champion) and Permian Mud Service, Inc. (Permian), filed a motion to compel arbitration that the trial court denied. They seek an order from this court directing the trial court to refer the underlying proceedings to arbitration. Their petition for writ of mandamus is conditionally granted in part and denied in part.
Background Facts
Real parties in interest Burl Fuller, Danny Alexander, and Billy York are former employees of Champion. They filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Peleg v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- In Re Golden Peanut Co., LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
- Nabors Drilling USA, LP v. Eder Pena, Individually, Maria Enriqueta Pena, Individually, and as Next Friend of Esmeralda and Edna Pena, Minors, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
- Temporary Alternatives, Inc. D/B/A dmDickason Personnel Services v. Misti K. Jamrowski, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
- Henry & Sons Construction Co., Inc. v. Pablo CamposCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.