Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 16, 1999No. 23446-7-IIPublished

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This case involves a real estate contract. The question is whether the seller had a duty to notify a transferee of the purchaser’s interest, of whom the seller had actual knowledge, of the seller’s intent to forfeit the purchaser’s interest. In our view, the answer is yes.

In 1984, Roland E. Moore sold the Tipperary Tavern to William O. Price. The sale was by real estate contract. Moore retained a seller’s interest. Hereafter, we refer to the tavern as “the property.”

In 1991, William Price sold his interest in the property to Carol Gager. The sale was by real estate contract. Price retained a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. StannardWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API