In re Transpacific Passenger Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The five remaining Defendants in this antitrust suit — Air New Zealand, All *946Nippon Airways (“ANA”), China Airlines, EVA Air, and Philippine Airlines — move for summary judgment on the basis of the filed rate doctrine, a defense to private antitrust suits, which provides that “to the extent Congress has given [an agency] authority to set rates ... and [the agency] has exercised that authority, such rates are just and reasonable as a matter of law and cannot be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017