In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
*1316MEMORANDUM OPINION
R. DAVID PROCTOR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
• This matter is before the court on the following cross motions for partial summary judgment: (1) Defendants’ Amended and Restated Motion Based on the Filed Rate Doctrine for Summary Judgment on the Alabama Subscribers’ Damages Claims (Doc. # 733); and (2) Alabama Subscriber Plaintiffs’‘ Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Filed-Rate Doctrine (Doc. # 770). The motions have been fully briefed. (Docs. # 734, 805, 835, 838, 839, 903, and 904).
I. Introduction
The Filed Rate Doctrine1 is judicially created and finds its…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fitzpatrick v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.