Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hilsabeck

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 27, 1985No. 84-112PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted certiorari in this case in order to determine whether Act 80-446 (now codified at Code 1975, § 14-9-41), is violative of either the Alabama Constitution or the United States Constitution.

The salient facts are as follows:

Petitioner Michael Hilsabeck was convicted of robbery in the first degree and rape, and was sentenced to serve two concurrent fifteen-year sentences. Hilsabeck filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the validity of Act 80-446, which denied him the benefit of correctional incentive time, commonly known as "good time." The trial court denied…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yeilding v. State Ex Rel. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Knight v. West Alabama Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Dearborn v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Opinion of JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Alabama Ed. Ass'n v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Louviere v. Mobile County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Magee v. BoydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  4. State v. L.N.A.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API