Legal Opinion

Dearborn v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1937No. 6 Div. 82PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainant seeks by this proceeding to assail the constitutionality of the act approved April 12, 1936, entitled, “An Act To provide for a more economical, convenient and uniform system of assessing and collecting taxes on real estate, including the enforcement of tax liens, in all Counties having a population of 110,000 or more, according to the last, or any succeeding Federal Census.” Gen.Acts 1936, Ex.Sess., p. 205.

The constitutional questions raised, and here forcibly argued, will be considered in the order of their presentation in brief. The act here in question is…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Peddycoart v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Knight v. West Alabama Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. Newton v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Rogers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API