Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 2, 2016No. 123592; A155404Published

1DissentDevore, J.

I write this note of apology to the majority, because I cannot agree, and to the trial court, because I believe it did not err. In my opinion, the record suffices to show that the trial court did exercise its discretion to determine that the probative value of the video outweighed its prejudice. And, I believe that the majority opinion cannot be reconciled with our recent decisions about what record we demand of our trial courts.

The majority declares that “the record does not reflect that the [trial] court exercised the discretion that it *34is afforded under OEC 403” and that “the record does…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. BorckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API