McManus v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, the defendant, the commissioner of environmental protection, was permitted to issue an administrative order to abate a violation of the wetlands laws pursuant to General Statutes § 22a-44 (a) after maintaining, for three years, a civil action pursuant to § 22a-44 (b) that was subsequently withdrawn without prejudice.1 We *656agree with the Appellate Court that the defendant was not authorized to issue such an order under the circumstances of this case. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the Appellate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Rozbicki v. HuybrechtsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Windels v. Environmental Protection CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Avalonbay Communities, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Zoning Commission v. Fairfield Resources Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- State v. GuerreraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.