Legal Opinion

Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 3, 1991No. Nos. Civ-1-89-190, Civ.-1-89-316Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDGAR, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the renewed motions of Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Provident”) (Court File No. 172) and the Government for summary judgment (Court File No. 173) as to Provident’s defenses relating to damages, not liability.

I. Background

This lawsuit grows out of various amendments to the Medicare Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq., which provide that Medicare is the secondary payor to group health plans under certain circumstances, including end-stage renal disease, the “working aged,” and the active disabled. (“MSP…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API