Legal Opinion
State v. Ramstad
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1925No. 18603. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Askren, J.
— Respondent was charged by information in the superior court for Snohomish county, as follows:
“He, the said J. A. Ramstad, on or about the 24th day of July, 1923, at the county of Snohomish, state of Washington, was the duly elected, qualified and acting county treasurer in and for the county of Snohomish, state of Washington. That as such county treasurer it became and-then and there was the duty of J. A. Ramstad to enter, make record of and collect the taxes due said Snohomish county, state of Washington, and keep the records, files, papers and receipts of said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. RamstadWashington Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Variety Children's Hosp., Inc. v. PerkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- State v. NorgardWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961