Legal Opinion

State v. Ramstad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1925No. 18603. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Rehearing.

Askren, J.

— Respondent was charged by information in the superior court for Snohomish county, as follows:

“He, the said J. A. Ramstad, on or about the 24th day of July, 1923, at the county of Snohomish, state of Washington, was the duly elected, qualified and acting county treasurer in and for the county of Snohomish, state of Washington. That as such county treasurer it became and-then and there was the duty of J. A. Ramstad to enter, make record of and collect the taxes due said Snohomish county, state of Washington, and keep the records, files, papers and receipts of said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RamstadWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Variety Children's Hosp., Inc. v. PerkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. State v. NorgardWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API