Legal Opinion

State v. Ramstad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1925No. 18603. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

The respondent is charged by information with the crime of mutilating a record appertaining to his office as county treasurer, the charging part of the information being as follows;

“He, the said J. A. Eamstad, on or about the 24th day of July, 1923, at the county of Snohomish, state of Washington, was the duly elected, qualified and acting county treasurer in and for the county of Sno-homish, state of Washington. That as such county treasurer it became and then and there was the duty of J. A. Eamstad to enter, make record of and collect the taxes due said Snohomish county, state of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. State v. RamstadWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API