Legal Opinion

Union Mutual Ass'n v. Montgomery

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1888PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Bill of interpleader. Defendant Ellis appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChahplin, J.

A bill of interpleader was filed by the above-named complainant against defendants, who each lays claim to a fund which the association acknowledges itself liable for and willing to pay to the one legally entitled. The following facts are admitted:

“1. That said Union Mutual Association is a co-operative and mutual benefit society, organized and doing business under and in pursuance of an act of the State of Michigan entitled cAn act to provide for the incorporation of co-operative and mutual benefit associations/ being chapter 118 of Howell’s Annotated Statutes; that the object of said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Osceola Tribe, No. 11 v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  2. Arthur v. Odd Fellows Beneficial Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Rood v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Porter v. PorterMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Supreme Conclave v. CappellaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
  2. Masonic Benevolent Ass'n v. BunchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. McEwen v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Atlantic Mutual Life Insurance v. GannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API