Legal Opinion

Tom v. Price

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1920PublishedCited by 18 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— Hon. Chas. Hays BROWN, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. L. D. Smith, Special Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The only question presented in this case is whether the notes sued on are tainted with usury and therefore nonenforceable.

The facts upon which this question is to be determined are undisputed, and are as set forth in the original bill, the case having come to this court upon the discretionary appeal allowed by the chancellor from his decree overruling the demurrer of the defendant which raised the question. ■ ( •

The facts, are:

“The defendant is justly indebted to the complainant on four promissory notes each for $500 dated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coghlan v. South Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hall v. CordellSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Hubble v. Morristown Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bank v. MannTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Senter v. BowmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Liquidator for the Hamilton National Bank of Chattanooga v. Lattimore Land CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Deaton v. ViseTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Goodwin Bros. Leasing, Inc. v. H & B INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. First American National Bank of Nashville v. Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API