Legal Opinion

Goodwin Bros. Leasing, Inc. v. H & B INC.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1980PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

Appellant, a Kentucky corporation, filed this action to collect a balance claimed under a contract dated August 27, 1974, between it and H & B Incorporated, a Tennessee corporation. Also joined as defendants were six individuals who had personally guaranteed the obligations of the corporate debtor under the contract. Both the Chancellor and the Court of Appeals held that the transaction, although in form a sale and leaseback of equipment, was in essence a secured loan made by appellant to H & B at a usurious rate of interest. Appellant was allowed recovery of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bedford v. Eastern Building and Loan Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Deaton v. ViseTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Cumberland Capital Corp. v. PattyTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hubble v. Morristown Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Vantage Technology, LLC v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Southeast Texas Inns, Inc. v. Prime Hospitality CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc. v. Cryotech of Kingsport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Williams v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  5. Continental Mortg. Investors v. Sailboat Key, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API