Legal Opinion
Bank v. Mann
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions
FROM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. Henry R. Gibson, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.
This is an action upon a note in the following words:
“ $2,668. Knoxville, Tenn., May 11, 1891.
“Eighteen months after date I promise to pay to the order of R. G. Johnson. $2,668.00, at Holston Banking and Trust Company. Value received, with interest at eight per cent, per annum.
“E. B. Mann. ’5
“Indorsed: W. W. Avery,
“R. G. Johnson.”
*19The note was not paid at maturity, and was duly protested and notice given, and the bill is filed against the maker and indorsers by the First National Bank of Johnson City and E. S. Wolfe. .
The bill alleges that the note was executed as part of the consideration for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Casler v. . Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Græme v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1873
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davidson v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
- Dennis v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- Tom v. PriceTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Gables Racing Ass'n v. PerskySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- McNary v. Farmers' Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.