White Unemployment Compensation Case

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This unemployment compensation case involves an application for benefits for the week ending March 11, 1961: The bureau, the referee and the board all concluded that the appellant was not entitled to receive benefits because he failed to meet the requirements of §§401 (b), 401(d) and 4(w)(l) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, and Bureau Regulations, 103, 104 and 105.

The appellant was last employed as an attorney with Freedman, Landy & Lorry, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on February 25, 1961, on which date he had a valid separation from his employment. The next day,…