Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sam Stockton Grading Co., Inc. v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 1993No. 9229SC763, 9229SC765Published

1Dissent

Judge WYNN

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from Part I of the majority opinion because I find that there exists a genuine issue of material fact regarding the existence of consideration for the execution of the promissory notes.

*634The majority asserts that consideration for the promissory notes exists because the plaintiffs agreed to release properties from the judgment liens. The agreements regarding the release of those properties, however, specifically state that the properties were released from the judgment lien in consideration of the defendants’ payment against the accrued interest of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bumgardner v. GrooverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Little v. . SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API