Legal Opinion

Little v. . Steele

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.

The plaintiffs contend that the liability of stockholders for assessment in case of insolvency is a contingent asset and constitutes a trust fund for the benefit of depositors and creditors of the bank. They take the position that this liability is not an assignable asset of the bank, Hood, Commissioner, v. Realty, Inc., 211 N. C., 583; and that it constitutes a trust fund to be equitably distributed for the benefit of all creditors, Hood, Commissioner, v. Trust Co., 209 N. C., 367, 184 S. E., 51. It has been so held by this Court in the cases cited and relied on by plaintiffs and in many…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hood Ex Rel. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sam Stockton Grading Co., Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Sam Stockton Grading Co., Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API