Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Planning Board of the Town of Brighton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoldman, J.
These are cross appeals from an order of Monroe County Special Term which directed, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and section 267 of the Town *315Law, the issuance of a temporary permit to operate a filling-station and at the same time denied a variance from the provisions of the zoning ordinance of the Town of Brighton. The respondent-appellant, John S. Cunningham, (hereinafter called “petitioner”) seeks to review the determinations of the Brighton Town Board, Planning Board, Board of Appeals, and the individuals comprising those boards (hereinafter called “ respondents ”),…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Matter of Larkin Co. v. SchwabNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Shepard v. Village of SkaneatelesNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Matter of Small v. MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Green Point Savings Bank v. Board of Zoning AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lippoth v. Zoning Bd. of App., City of So. PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Rebhan v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of MilanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Glaser v. LarkinNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Ralph Peck Holding Corp. v. BurnsNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973