Legal Opinion

Cardillo v. Canusa Extrusion Engineering, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1985No. Docket 78738PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeasely, J.

In this action for breach of an oral contract, quantum meruit, and intentional interference with contractual relations, defendants’ motion for summary judgment under GCR 1963, 117.2(3) was denied. After the trial court entered an order to that effect and certified a concise statement of facts and proceedings 1 that was approved as to form by both sides, defendants appeal by leave granted.

Plaintiff Cardillo & Associates, Inc., is a Michigan corporation wholly owned by plaintiff Jerry E. Cardillo. Defendant Canusa Extrusion Engineering, Inc. (Canusa), is a Michigan corporation owned principally…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alford v. RaschiatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Shattuck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Krause v. BoraksMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Smith v. StarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Jaenicke v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. All Points Traders, Inc. v. Barrington AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Ashton General Partnership, Inc. v. Federal Data Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Turner Holdings, Inc. v. Howard Miller Clock Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
  5. GC Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API