Legal Opinion
GC Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 2001No. Docket 210998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilder, J.
Defendant Guardian Alarm Company appeals by leave granted from a trial court order denying its motion for summary disposition brought under MCR 2.116(C)(7), (8), and (10). We reverse and remand.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff G. C. Timmis & Company is a registered investment advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission and a broker-dealer member of the National Association of Securities Dealers. Defendant Guardian Alarm Company is a Michigan corporation that sells home and commercial security systems. By letter dated October 25, 1995, plaintiff’s managing director, Gerald C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Graham v. FordMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lane v. Kindercare Learning Centers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Krause v. BoraksMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Amburgey v. SauderMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- G C Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Derbabian v. S & C Snowplowing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Derbabian v. S & C Snowplowing, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- GC Timmis & Co. v. Guardian Alarm Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001