Legal Opinion

Janice Doty Unlimited, Inc. v. Stoecker

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 7, 1988No. 87 C 9871PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

This diversity litigation arises out of a contract between plaintiff Janice Doty Unlimited, d/b/a Nannys Unlimited (“Doty”)» and defendants William J. and Grace M. Stoecker (“the Stoeckers”) for the placement and services of a domestic professional. Doty brought a suit for breach of contract against the Stoeckers, and the Stoeckers responded with a counterclaim. The Stoeckers now move for leave to file an amended counterclaim that adds an additional count. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Stoeckers’ motion.

Factual Background

Doty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Hofeld v. Nationwide Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Warren v. LeMayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Antonio C. Mastrobuono and Diana G. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., a Corporation, Nick Diminico, Richard F. Benzer and Mark StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. ISC-Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Altech, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  3. WTM, INC. v. HenneckDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  4. Telular Corp. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  5. GoldenTree Asset Management LP v. BNP Paribas S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API