Janice Doty Unlimited, Inc. v. Stoecker
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
This diversity litigation arises out of a contract between plaintiff Janice Doty Unlimited, d/b/a Nannys Unlimited (“Doty”)» and defendants William J. and Grace M. Stoecker (“the Stoeckers”) for the placement and services of a domestic professional. Doty brought a suit for breach of contract against the Stoeckers, and the Stoeckers responded with a counterclaim. The Stoeckers now move for leave to file an amended counterclaim that adds an additional count. 1 For the reasons set forth below, we deny the Stoeckers’ motion.
Factual Background
Doty…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hofeld v. Nationwide Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Warren v. LeMayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Antonio C. Mastrobuono and Diana G. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., a Corporation, Nick Diminico, Richard F. Benzer and Mark StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- ISC-Bunker Ramo Corp. v. Altech, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- WTM, INC. v. HenneckDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Telular Corp. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- GoldenTree Asset Management LP v. BNP Paribas S.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.