Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Partridge

California Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1973No. Sac. 7973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

10 Cal.3d 94 (1973)

514 P.2d 123

109 Cal. Rptr. 811

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

WAYNE E. PARTRIDGE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. Sac. 7973.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

September 25, 1973.

COUNSEL

Rich, Fuidge, Dawson, Marsh, Morris, Sanbrook & Grove and Chester Morris for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jones & Weldon, Charles R. Weldon and Leonard Sacks for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

TOBRINER, J.

The instant case presents a somewhat novel question of insurance coverage: when two negligent acts of an insured — one…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BancInsure, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  2. Integon National Insurance Company v. ReeceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API