Legal Opinion

Golding-Keene Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 28, 1960No. C.D. 2172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest was filed pursuant to the provisions of section 516(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (T.D. 49646) and Public Law 773 (62 Stat. 869), which grants to manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers the privilege of challenging by protest the classification of, and the rate of duty imposed upon, imported merchandise of a class or kind “manufactured, produced, or sold at wholesale by him.”

The statute, section 516(b), as amended, so far as pertinent, reads as follows:

*171[Sec. 516] (b) Classification. — The Secretary of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Cronite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Great Lakes Foundry Sand Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. Richard v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  2. Victor England Agencies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. B. & K. Instruments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API