Legal Opinion

Cronite Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 19, 1957No. C. D. 1847PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

This cause of action arose pursuant to the provisions of section 516 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1516 (b)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1077) and Public Law 773, 80th Congress (62 Stat. 869), which granted to manufacturers, producers, or wholesalers the privilege of challenging by protest the classification of and the rate of duty imposed upon imported merchandise of a class or kind “manufactured, produced, or sold at wholesale by him.”

Two protests were filed by plaintiff against the liquidations by the collector of customs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. The United States (Ralph Valls, Party-In-Interest) v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. ASG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. SCM SCM Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  4. Golding-Keene Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. American Nickeloid Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API