Legal Opinion
Flusk v. Erie R. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 29, 1953No. Civ. A. 1057-51PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
A jury trial lasting over two weeks, and consisting, in fact, of two cases, the first a negligence case by Flusk, an Erie Railroad employee, against both Erie and General Motors Corporation, the other an indemnity case by Erie Railroad against General Motors, resulted in a general verdict, for plaintiff in the negligence case in the amount of $45,000. It also resulted in a special verdict on the cross-claim in the indemnity case of Erie against General (Motors, upon the basis of which special verdict the court entered judgment on both counts, in favor of defendant.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc. Marra Bros., Inc. v. Wm. Spencer & Son CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Skidmore v. Baltimore & OR Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States v. CoplonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John F. Kennedy v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. United States Steel Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Brenham v. Southern Pacific CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1971
- Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Bree v. JalbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.