Legal Opinion
Landwatch Lane Cnty. v. Lane Cnty.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 28, 2018No. A166333PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
*43Petitioner, who owns a parcel of land zoned for exclusive farm use (EFU) in Lane County, received county approval under a 2013 statute to build three replacement dwellings on the property. Respondent LandWatch Lane County (LandWatch) appealed that decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA), which reversed the county. On judicial review, petitioner argues that LUBA's order is unlawful in substance because it misconstrues the requirements of Oregon Laws 2013, chapter 462, section 2. We agree, and we therefore reverse and remand LUBA's order.
We take the relevant facts from LUBA's opinion.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Landwatch Lane Cnty. v. Lane Cnty.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019