Legal Opinion

Rauch v. Bankers National Bank of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 8, 1908No. Gen. No. 13,966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

This is an appeal from a judgment by the Superior Court of nil capiat and for costs against the plaintiffs below (appellants here) in an action of assumpsit.

The suit was brought on six checks, in regard to each of which there were two special counts in the declaration.

The first of these counts in each case described the check as drawn by one Max Belitz on The Bankers National Bank (the defendant and appellee) and delivered by said Belitz to the plaintiffs, and then averred that on, to-wit: April 9, 1903, the plaintiffs presented the said check to the defendant, for payment thereof, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Munn v. BurchIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Fourth National Bank v. City National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Shaffner v. EdgertonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Bentley, Murray & Co. v. LaSalle Street Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Moultrie Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Merchant's National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  5. State Bank v. Mid-City Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API