Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Moultrie Banking Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 24, 1932No. 21969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Before the acceptance of a check by the drawee there is .no privity of contract between the drawee and the payee of the cheek. The payment of a check by the drawee on an unauthorized indorsement of the check does not constitute acceptance of the check. Where there is no privity of contract between the payee of a check and the drawee, the cashing of the check by the drawee upon its unauthorized indorsement constitutes no violation of any right of the payee, and affords no right of action either ex contractu or ex delicto, by the payee against the drawee. Bank of the Republic v. Millard, 10…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Washington v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Rauch v. Bankers National Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  3. J. M. Houston Grocer Co. v. Farmers BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Freeman v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Trust Co. v. Refrigeration Supplies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Trust Co. v. Refrigeration Supplies, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API