Legal Opinion
Celious v. Worley Limited
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 31, 2025No. 4:22-cv-00811Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT April 01, 2025 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION § DENISE CELIOUS, § § Plaintiff, § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 22-811 § WORLEY LIMITED, § § Defendant. § § § MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Denise Celious claims that her former employer paid her less than her colleagues because of her sex (female) and race (black). The employer, Worley Limited, moves for summary judgment on all claims. (Docket Entry No. 31). Ms. Celious responded, (Docket Entry No. 32),1 and Worley replied, (Docket Entry No. 36). Worley has also moved to strike some…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.