Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Bi-Lo Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 4, 1993No. 2078PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Appellants (“Partners”) brought this action alleging two common law torts, wrongful interference with a contract and civil conspiracy, and a statutory violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA) 1 against respondents Bi-Lo, Inc. (“Bi-Lo”); Marshall Collins, John Prengaman and Patrick Curran (hereinafter collectively “the Bi-Lo respondent”); James Thomas (“Thomas”); and Bart Sims (“Sims”). The court granted summary judgment in favor of all respondents except Sims on all claims. Partners appeal. We affirm.

The appellants and respondent Thomas were partners…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Berkebile v. OutenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Fuller-Ahrens Partnership v. S.C. Deparment of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Rountree v. IngleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Nelson v. BryantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Glasscock, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Spirax Sarco, Inc. v. SSI Engineering, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015
  3. RCDI Construction, Inc. v. Spaceplan/Architecture, Planning & Interiors, P.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2001
  4. Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. CoffeyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  5. W & N Construction Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API